Injections occupy a strange place in musculoskeletal care. They are enormously common, they genuinely help a great many people, and the published evidence for several of them is thinner and shorter-lived than most patients are led to believe.
Most of what is written about them online comes from practices that sell them. These pages are written by someone who performs them, which is a different thing — it means being able to say both that they work and where they stop working.
Where are you with this?
These eleven pages follow the sequence a decision actually moves through. Start where you are.
Before you decide anything
The option with the best evidence is the one least often delivered properly.
Understanding the options
What each one does, and what the trials actually found.
For your joint
The decision looks different at the knee than at the shoulder.
Having one
What the appointment is actually like, and how it is done.
Afterwards
What is expected, what is not, and when to ask again.
How these pages handle evidence
Where a claim rests on a trial or a systematic review, it is cited and the finding is reported as the authors reported it — including when the finding is unhelpful to the procedure. Where I am describing clinical judgment rather than published data, it is labelled as such.
That distinction matters more here than it did for the rehabilitation pages. Coverage rules are a matter of record. Whether a given injection helps a given person is a question the literature answers with real uncertainty, and pretending otherwise would be the easiest way to make these pages useless.